Sunday, December 9, 2012

What population group is at highest risk for osteomalacia?

Q. a. Infants
b. Elderly men
c. Adult women
d. Children ages 2-12 years

A. The condition called Osteomalacia is one where there is a significant softening of the bones in your body. It is usually caused by a vitamin D deficiency. In children, this condition is known as rickets. The concern is that Soft bones are more likely to bow and fracture than harder, more healthy bones.

This is similar, yet different from, osteoporosis, which is a another bone disorder that can also cause bone fracturing. Osteomalacia occurs when the bone-building process in our bodies does not perform correctly, while osteoporosis develops later because of a weakening of previously constructed bone.

Some of the symptoms of osteomalacia are achy pain in the bones and muscle weakness. Typically treatment involves increasing the amount of Vitamin D and calcium in addition to treating any underlying disorders that may be contributing to the deficiencies.

People who have both inadequate dietary intake of vitamin D and little exposure to sunlight have the highest risk of developing this disorder. Therefore the risk is highest in older adults as well as those who rarely get outdoors such as people who are housebound or hospitalized.

Insufficient sunlight is the cause of many problems. Sunlight is truly indispensable to our good health and peace of mind. Many people hide from the sun and deny themselves of the sun�s healing powers. They fear the sun�s damaging ultra-violet rays. History tells us the human race evolved and thrived under the light and energy of the sun.

Call for an appointment with your health care provider if you have symptoms of osteomalacia, or if you think that you may be at risk for this disorder.

For those who are seeking a healthy solution to many issues, but don't believe that medicinal solutions are the best way to go, let me point you to an alternative care website that will shine more light on these matters.

Follow this link for more information... http://tinyurl.com/24bfrgt . They have a wonderful view on health and the importance of sunlight in our lives.


Is it normal to feel cold in 70 degrees?
Q. It is 70 degrees outside and my freind is cold. She is bundled up in a long sleeved shirt, a scarf, and a jacket and still shivering. Is this normal?

A. absolutely not normal 70's are "perfect". theirs no reason why she should be cold (well not a normal reason) ok it could be a number of things. These include but aren�t limited to:Anemia (low blood count, especially common in menstruating women with significant monthly blood loss);
Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar);
Age (the very young or elderly may have more difficulty with body temperature regulation); (but i don't think it's that lol)
Exposure to cool or cold environments without proper protection;
Stress or anxiety;
Poor health or infections such as the common cold, leukemia, lupus, bladder infection, septicemia (blood infection), hepatitis, Menkes disease, decreased immune function and others;
Malnutrition;
Gallstones (chills and sweating, along with pain);
Medications (potential side effects from narcotic pain relievers, beta interferons, others);
Anorexia nervosa (poor nutrition, anemia, very low body weight, fatigue);
Allergic reaction;
Uncontrolled diabetes;
B�vitamin complex deficiency (may increase cold sensitivity).

(feeling cold is one of the symptom)

Feeling Cold

Anemia can make you feel cold all the time, even in a warm room.

What patients said:

"I notice sometimes I get really cold, I get chills."

"Sometimes I get really, really cold. It could be hot, and I'd be cold."
Chills can occur with an infection, making you shiver and feel cold even though your body temperature may be normal or even elevated. Chills can happen to anyone and are most common at the start or end of an infection. Chills with a normal or elevated temperature should not be treated with warm clothing or blankets, as this can raise the body temperature to a dangerous level.

If your body temperature falls below the normal range, even by just a few degrees, you have hypothermia. Hypothermia can be dangerous, especially the farther your body temperature falls. If your temperature falls below 96 degrees, you should seek immediate medical care. You can treat mild or severe hypothermia until help arrives by warming the person slowly with blankets and making sure the person is dry.

When you are very sensitive to cold weather, you may have cold intolerance. Cold intolerance can be a sign that your body has a hard time warming itself. Common causes of cold intolerance include anorexia, anemia and hypothyroidism. If you find even mildly temperatures difficult to bear, you should contact your health care provider.now i said it's "absolutely not normal " but let me clarify in 70 degrees isn't cold but it's not hot-now to me 70s you don't need a coat or jacket. but to have long sleeves scarf and a jacket and still cold! i don't think it's normal. hope i help


Should my friend be concerned about the nutrients that she is consuming in excess?
Q. She is 20 yrs old, 5'4", 114 pounds....a year ago she weighed 120 pounds, and she has just started college. Recently she has been feeling tired and has difficulty concentrating in class.
She evaluated her diet and noticed that she consumes more than the amounts of vitamin A, vitamin C, and calcium. Her calorie intake is less than the recommended amount and, since she is losing weight is not enough to maintain her body weight. Her iron intake is well below the recommendation for women.

Is this a health risk?

A. This is not necessarily a health risk, but there are a couple factors that you listed that need to change. Her weight at 114 is within the "normal" range; that's not a problem at all. Her goal calorie intake will significantly depend on her exercise habits. I'll list the appropriate scenarios based off of maintaining her current weight: 1530 (little or no dedicated exercise), 1750 (exercise 3 times per week), 1860 (exercise 5 times per week), 2080 (exercise everyday - everyday, no missing).

Her intake of vitamin C and calcium are of no real concern. They will not build up in her body, nor will they negatively affect her energy levels. The obvious concerns of what you've listed are her vitamin A and iron intake amounts. It sounds like you're already aware of vitamin A being a fat-soluble vitamin. If taken in excess (4,000 IU +) over a long period of time (12-15 months), it could become toxic in her body. I'm not saying that this is the case with your friend, but the levels of vitamins A, D, E, and K should be well regulated. Also, I listed the lowest precautionary level at 4,000 IU daily. People have taken doses of 100,000 IU per day and been able to reverse the toxic effect so, don't worry too much. Just get her to assess it before it becomes an issue. Her daily vitamin A intake should be around 2,300 IU or 700 mcg RE.

As for her iron deficiency, this would explain her low energy levels. This is a simple fix. I find that it's usually easier to add something to one's diet than it is to remove something. She can increase her consumption of high iron foods (red meat, fish, poultry, lentils, beans, leaf vegetables, tofu, chickpeas, black-eyed peas, too many to list) or simpler yet, she can take an iron supplement. A supplement would require no change in her eating habits. She would be more likely to accomplish this everyday. With supplementing iron, one should also increase their intake of folic acid and vitamin B-12, as iron depletes these in the body. I know of a supplement called Tri-Iron Folic that would be perfect. It's made by Nutrilite, the best in the supplement business. I personally only take their supplements because of their consistency and quality control (which are huge issues when you look into supplement companies), not to mention that they are the choice of many Olympic athletes. They are hard to find, as they are privately distributed. I get mine from a reliable source online, www.keylagohealth.com.

If your friend addresses these issues appropriately and still has similar symptoms, she should see her physician. There always could be some underlying issue that you may not be aware of.

I hope this helps.


in what stage of kidney cancer can you physically feel it?
Q. just wondering, at what point in the kidney cancer can the person actually feel a lump or be in pain?
which stage/how bad?

A. I had a 10.5cm tumor as part of a 15cm mass that had no overt symptoms ie. I could take off my shirt and the RN/Physician could not feel it. There is no blood test that will detect it. Also I had no pain or
blood in my urine. I had some mild fatigue but was very active and worked two jobs. I was being treated for a vitamin D deficiency and I had a very slight increase in my calcium level. My physician was testing me for a possible thyroid problem, and the results of that testing came back normal. A CT scan was done - and that's when the whopper tumor was discovered. It was technically a stage 3,
but within 4mos of my nephrechtomy it had metestazed to my bones, and a few months ago I had to have my right humerus<upper right arm bone>removed and replaced with a plate and cement...
My worst systemic pain was when it had spread to my arm ie. it ate up over half my arm bone and cause microfractures to the bone, and my arm bone was on the verge of snapping. I reacted to the anesthesia then too - and lost 50lbs. in body weight. Sometimes a person will not even discover they have kidney cancer until such an advanced state.


About 3% of all new cancers reported in the USA and the UK are Kidney cancers, so it's somewhat rare. Twice as many men contract it as women. About 1/2 of Kidney cancers involve a defect of the VHL gene. Obesity and Smoking are risk factors<I am not obiese and had quit smoking cigarettes about 5 years before discovering it - and I do have distant ancestors born with Kidney defects> It tends to not respond to traditional chemotherapy, but does respond to immunotherapy drugs like interferon. In early stages it is rather easily curable via surgery, which is what is so frustrating. Finding it an early stage cures it, but it's often tough to find.

Some people have symptoms at an early cureable stage, but quite a few of us don't have any symptoms...so if there's a history in your family and/or you're just concerned, I'd get a CT scan.
I'm now considered terminal, but if I had not been scanned I would have likely died several months ago. I'm still a fighter, and I'm active, and I haven't given up hope. . I would like to see this cancer defeated - and the key is simply early detection and better ways to detect it.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

No comments:

Post a Comment